• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Aaand they’re more powerful for the same (or even lower) price. All the people saying you can’t build anything better than the Steam Machine for the same price have been awfully quiet these last few days. I guess the memes about Valve fanboys have some truth to them.

    On the other hand, the Steam Machine is smaller and needs less power, so there’s that. I don’t know if anyone cares that much, but I can appreciate very small PCs.

    • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Is needing less power a plus when talking about a gaming pc? The steam machine uses less power than the competition because they’ve kneecapped the SoC with power draw limits, limiting performance.

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not a major concern, or even a minor concern for most. But it’s still a plus. Less money spent on electricity bills (even if it’s a tiny amount), and less strain on the environment (even if it’s an even tinier difference).

  • auzy1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    And unlike Nintendo switch, you can play games you bought 15 years ago… and use other stores or emulation

  • MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m on the reservation list for a Steam Machine and personally have no regrets, but I’m so happy these exist. I don’t think it has to be a big competition, but between not appealing to a mass audience and have limited stock, the Steam Machine may have inadvertently ushered in a prebuilt Linux PC revolution, and that’s a wonderful thing.

  • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    It feels so needlessly aggressive. Valve openly stated that there are alternatives to the Steam Machine, and they aren’t trying to own the market. Calling your prebuilt the “Steamroller” is kind of a dickhead move. That’s like Del Taco coming out with a deep friend taco shell and calling it “Fuck your Chalupa, bitch.”

    ITT: People who have no idea how marketing and advertising work.

    • bigbangdangler@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Eh, I see your point, but it feels pretty tongue-in-cheek to me. Steamroller is just a cool name that implies the thing is a workhorse.

    • Atropos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      That’s not really how I read it. Clearly they are leveraging vale products, (steam os) so include steam in the name. They probably want this name to evoke strength and power, so what’s something with steam in the name that is powerful? A steamroller.

      I don’t think it is meant to roll steam!